CONTENT TEAM KNOWLEDGE — ORIGINAL FICTIONAL WORKED RECORD
This describes an invented training project, not a client operation or a real approval event.

ID: RECEIPT-01
Title: Which total belongs in the spoken comparison?
Status: approved teaching version 2
Record date: 18 September 2026
Owner role: producer; assign a named owner in a real project
Reviewer role: fact-check editor
Canonical home: use one shared record URL in a real project
Access: public teaching material. This does not imply permission to publish a real client record.

QUESTION
Should the script compare the item prices or the full order totals?

DECISION
Compare the final totals. First order: 199 + 35 + 10 = Rs 244.
Second order: Rs 219 all-in. Difference: Rs 25; second order cheaper.

SOURCE
Original fictional receipt fixture in Machine House’s Hinglish teaching exercise, version 1. These are invented prices, not observed app data.
https://machinehouse.media/resources/hinglish-scriptwriting/adaptation-sheet.txt

REASON
The viewer is deciding which order costs less. Comparing 199 with 219 omits delivery and handling from only one order.

SUPERSEDED VERSION 1
“The first order is cheaper at Rs 199.” Rejected because the line compares item price with final total. Retain this as history; do not offer it as current guidance.

CURRENT APPROVED WORDING
“The first order totals 244 rupees. The second totals 219, so the second order is 25 rupees cheaper.”
Adaptation may change the spoken register but must retain both totals and the difference. A fact change requires another review.

DEPENDENCIES
Script / receipt graphic / captions / descriptive transcript / short adaptation.
Before release, their amounts and meaning must agree.

REVIEW TRIGGER
Any change to the sample receipts or comparison premise. In a real pricing example, also specify a calendar review date and recheck current terms and sources.

CHANGE PROCEDURE
Propose change with new evidence; owner confirms scope; reviewer checks arithmetic and wording; publish new version; mark old version superseded; identify affected deliverables and notify their owners through the agreed project workflow.

HANDOFF TEST
Ask a new editor which order is cheaper, why the rejected sentence fails and which files need a correction if a total changes. They should answer from this record without asking the original writer.

BLANK RECORD
ID / title / status / version / exact canonical location:
Question:
Decision and usable wording:
Evidence and source date/version:
Reason; alternative considered:
Owner / reviewer / approval record:
Allowed readers / reuse limits:
Affected deliverables:
Supersedes / superseded by:
Next review date or trigger:
Unresolved question: