WRITING · 16 DEC 2025 · 2 MIN READ

Celebrity guests get views. Experts build the show.

We tagged every episode by guest type, topic, mood, and fame level, then ran the numbers — the data disagreed with the playbook.

Rishwajeet Singh
Rishwajeet Singh Founder, Machine House Media
Originally on LinkedIn →

Our podcast just won Apple's Best of 2025. And we got there by doing the opposite of what every content strategist tells you to do. I would know — I am one of them.

I do strategy for The Masoom Minawala Show. When I started, I spent weeks inside the analytics, tagging every episode by guest type, topic, mood, and fame level, then running the numbers.

I expected to confirm what everyone believes about podcast growth. Book a famous guest, their fans tune in, some percentage subscribes. Book an even bigger name. Repeat.

The data said I was wrong.

The Discovery

The pattern was clear — celebrity episodes weren't growing the channel. They brought reach, but it was expert episodes that built the community. The difference wasn't subtle. Here are some recent examples:

Shloka Ambani episode — 300K views, press coverage everywhere, multiple pages writing about the podcast.

Mitesh Rajani episode — celebrity makeup artist, not a household name — 200K views but significantly more subscribers gained and a LOT more comments.

100K fewer views. More people who actually wanted to come back.

Why This Happens

In a space full of fluff — generic advice, surface-level content, the same recycled tips (and even guests!) — real expertise is rare.

Most women will never sit across from a makeup artist who does Bollywood faces. Never get 30 minutes with a specialist who's spent decades mastering one craft. Never have a wealth expert walk them through exactly what to do.

The podcast becomes that access point. Not fame — access. Real expertise you can't get anywhere else.

Celebrity episodes bring people through the door. Expert episodes give them a reason to stay.

The Principle

Masoom's goal was never "biggest podcast." It was "best podcast for women."
Not a tagline for her — an operating principle. If you want to be the best podcast for women, you cover everything women care about. All of it.

Almost all women guests, not for optics, but because that's who the show is for. Deep expertise over surface-level fluff. Comprehensive coverage over chasing viral moments.

What That Looks Like

Deep-dive guides — "Our wealth guide," "Our skincare guide," "Our fitness guide" — featuring practitioners who actually do the work, not just talk about it. A 30-minute episode on eyebrows. Just eyebrows, with a specialist eyebrow stylist.

"If we're the best podcast for women, we cover everything women care about. Eyebrows included." Masoom's clarity here is incredible.

That's the difference between chasing reach and serving an audience. You don't skip topics because they're small. You cover them because your audience needs them.

The Result

In my tenure: 70K to 120K subscribers. Apple's Best of 2025.

Celebrity episodes put you on the map. But what builds a community is giving people access to experts they'd never reach otherwise — real value in a space full of fluff.

DMs open if you need content help, btw.